Implicitness of Logos and Explicitness of Logics in Ancient Philosophy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54889/issn.2744-208X.2022.2.1.1

Keywords:

lógos, dialectics, syllogistics, Herakleitos, Parmenides, Plato, Aristotle

Abstract

We consider semantic and syntactic transformations of the concept of "the logical" in the ancient philosophy in the form of crypto-logos, para-logismos, dia-logos, and syl-logismos.  We interpret Heraclitus' concept of Logos as a cryptologos through which intuitive insight (epístasthai gnóomen) reveals hidden or implicit harmony (harmoníe aphanés) in nature (phýsis) as a conceptual unity of ontic opposites (tà enantía). In Pramenides' paraconsistent concept of the identity of Being and thought, we point to para-logical hypotheses about the One that are carried out through antithetical deductions of thought and which maintain the dynamics of the ontic determinations of being (ón) in the statics of the conceptual determinations of Being (tò eînai). As the beginning of the explicative granulation of ''the logical'' we consider Plato's concept of the dialectical skill (dialektikè tékhne) of dividing concepts of genus into species and sub-species that logically represent ontic opposites in problem-formulated questions. Finally Aristotle's concept of lógos as a statement-making sentence / proposition (lógos apophantikós) made explicit the Being (tò eînai), or the Being as Being (tò ón hê ón), in semantic and syntactic figures and modes of syllogistic inferences in which ontological (eînai), ontic (ón), conceptual (logikôos) and linguistic (légomenon) correspondence is shown. We conclude that with these changes in the concept of lógos, the path has been taken from the hidden or implicit Truth of the phenomena of nature and the world (pân) to explicit truthfulness of propositions as the unhiddeness (alétheia) of Being trough the semantical and syntactical visibility of the logical structures of being, thought and language in scientific knowledge based on demonstration (apoódeiksis).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristoteles' Metaphysik. (1978). Erster Halbband: Bücher I (A) – VI (E). In der Übersetzung von Hermann Bonitz. Neu bearbeitet, mit Einleitung und Kommentar herausgegeben von Horst Seidl. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

Aristoteles' Metaphysik. (1980). Zweiter Halbband: Bücher VII (Z) – XIV (N). In der Übersetzung von Hermann Bonitz. Neu bearbeitet, mit Einleitung und Kommentar herausgegeben von Horst Seidl. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

Aristotle - Collected Works (1963 ). Edited by W.D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aristotle, W.D. Ross (Editor) (1957). Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary (Oxford University Press academic monograph reprints). Oxford at the Clarend Press.

Aristotle Metaphysics (1997). A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary by W.D.Ross. Volume I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Aristotle Metaphysics (1997). A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary by W. D. Ross. Volume II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Complete Works of Aristotle (1995). The Revised Oxford Translation. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. Volume One. Princeton / Bollingen Series LXXI.2. Princeton University Press.

Complete Works of Aristotle(1995). The Revised Oxford Translation. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. Volume Two. Princeton / Bollingen Series LXXI. 2. Princeton University Press.

Barnes, J. (1983). The Presocratic Philosophers. Routledge.

Barnes, J. (2007). Truth, etc. Six lectures on ancient logic. Clarendon Press. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bonitz, H. (1848). Aristotelis Metaphysica. Recognovit et enarravit. Pars prior. I-Marcus.

Bonitz, H. (1849). Aristotelis Metaphysica. Recognovit et enarravit. Pars posterior. II. Marcus.

Cooke, H. P., Tredennick, H. (1938). Aristotle. Categories. On Interpretation. Prior Analytics. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press.

Tredennick, H., Forster, E. S. (1960). Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. Topica. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press.

Diels, H. – Kranz, W. (1951). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Griechisch und Deutsch. Unveränderte Nachdruck der 6. Auflage. Herausgegeben von Walther Kranz. I-III. Weidemann.

Henn, M. J. (2003). Parmenides of Elea. A Verse Translation with Interpretative Essays and Commentary to the Text. London: Praeger

Heidegger, M. (1998). Parmenides. Indiana University Press.

Heidegger, M. (2003). Plato's Sophist. Indiana University Press.

Heidegger, M. (1980). Heraclitus Seminar, 1966-67. The University of Alabama Press.

Ibrulj, N. (2 005). ''Racionalna konstrukcija svijeta iz ontologije znaka''. Dijalog : časopis za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju. 2005, god. 11, br. 1/2, str. 155-172.

Index Aristotelicus (1870). Edidit Hermannus Bonitz. Berolini, A.

Łukasiewicz, J. (1951). Aristotle's Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. Oxford University Press. 2nd Edition, enlarged, 1957. Reprinted by Garland Publishing in 1987.

Meinwald, C. C. (1991). Plato's Parmenides. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195064452.001.0001

Plato Complete Works (1997). Edited by Plato, John M. Cooper, D. S. Hutchinson. Hackett Pub Co.

Plato, Allen, R. E. (1997). The Dialogues of Plato. Plato's Parmenides, Revised Edition. Volume 4. Yale University Press.

Plato, Thomas Maguire (1882). PLATWNOS PARMENIDHS. The Parmenides of Plato. Edith Introtuction, Analysisi, and Notes by Thomas Maguire. Dublin: Hodgges, and London: Longmans.

Plato, SOPHYSTES [ e peri tou ontos ], 260 a 5-6. In: Piatonis Dialogi. Secundum Thrasylli Tetralogias. Recognovit Martinus Wohlrab. Vol. I. Lipsiae in aedibus B. G. Teubneri. MCMII.

Roecklein, R. J. (2010). Plato versus Parmenides. The Debate over Coming-into-Being in Greek Philosophy. Lexington Books.

Piatonis Dialogi. Secundum Thrasylli Tetralogias. Recog-novit Martinus Wohlrab. Vol. I. Lipsiae in aedibus B. G. Teubneri. MCMII.

Tugendhat, E. (2003). TI KATA TINOS. Eine Untersuchung zu Struktur und Ursprung aristotelischer Grundbegriffe. Munchen, Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-12

How to Cite

Ibrulj, N. (2022). Implicitness of Logos and Explicitness of Logics in Ancient Philosophy . THE LOGICAL FORESIGHT - Journal for Logic and Science, 2(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.54889/issn.2744-208X.2022.2.1.1